Someone once asked me: Have you been reading some kind of "positive thinking" books lately?
I said, I have read them in the past, but they reafirmed what I already knew, and hold true. Positive thinking works, if you truly, actually think and stay positive.
It's funny how it became "trendy" or “in” and then "out" like it's a scarf. That shows that most people do not understand the depth and power of “postive thinking.” The hidden purpose of "positive thinking" is that if you are truly a positive person, you will make your surroundings more positive/energized/happy. If you are not truly creating a postive energy or “vibe” you will not be making your surroundings more energized, and thus will not be feeding into a system that will make your life more positive. It’s like wishing for more money in the bank, but never putting any money in the bank.
Most people think watching a movie or following a "trend" will make them “positive” or “prosperous.” It’s not quite that simple or that easy. Too many people are not willing to do the (internal) "work" required to become a positive/uplifting person. Work like, letting go of anger and resentment, identifying and correcting negative forces or actions in your life/lifestyle, ect. First you “think positive” then you must “act postivie”, many people do not take that critical next step. Taking the step means consciously realizing you have a choice to make things positive, negative, or neutral/indifferent.
Choose positive. Sometimes this requires some inner strength, but it’s that choice to rise above, to take the high road, the uplifting way, that will raise your energy and put “money” in your positivity “bank.”
Money by the way has nothing to do with being postive. Some of the most negative people in the world are fabulously wealthy – albiet spiritually poor. Being positive can make you more materially wealthy, but that comes from helping ground you in what you really want, and opening the doors to real happiness.
We must get rid of the notion that you can watch a movie, or read a book and -- POOF! -- You are now a positive person! It’s misguided.
You know how some people just want to just take a pill to be thin, "fit" or healthy? They lose some weight, maybe look good/better but they are not really thin, they are just malnourished. It's fake. Soon they crack -- "go negative" -- and gain back all the weight and more. They never become the 'healthy thin' they dream about because they don't/won't do the work. You can no more pretend to be positive than a sick person pretends to be healthy. Don’t get stuck in that cycle.
I have always been a naturally optimistic and positive person. My Mother was the same way. "Be true to yourself, uplifiting/positive towards others and do what you love." Every Many dreams I have dreamed, and pursued has come true. Because I do the work. I'm realistic, driven and I'm smart. I don’t drag anyone down. I only ever bring them up, or walk away – be neutral at the minimum. I won't let negative people/things drag me down. If I was you I wouldn't either.
My generation has to be positive. The world seems to be falling apart faster everyday, and the least productive thing to do is whine and complain; that’s what I see too much of.
Don’t sit and tell yourself and others "there is nothing I can do" or "I give up".
Giving up on being positive, is giving up on yourself; on self improvement and on the world. Make a difference in the world. Make the world a better place, and be willing to do the work to make it so. Just by doing what you love, and "being positive" you’re helping.
I wish more people would. But it seems to me, lots of people just like to focus on tearing people down. Being negative. These are not positive people and they will never be truly happy or successful, even if they become materially successful in the process.
You can't save the world, but you can save/uplift yourself. If everyone did that, imagine how great the world would be.
Sunday, May 2, 2010
Being Positive
Posted by
Postmodernism
at
6:17 PM
0
comments
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
PHARAOH - The Pitch
PHARAOH
'The Da Vinci Code' meets 'The Matrix'
Logline:
The discovery of an ancient Egyptian Artifact -- containing the Holy Blood of the first Pharaoh -- sets off a power struggle in the worlds oldest Secret Society, as one man must clone the blood and bring the Pharaoh back to stop Artificial Intelligence from taking over the world.
* * *
• A trilogy in the vein of Star Wars -- set right here in our very own galaxy, our world -- at it's core is a powerful empire (a Secret Society) and a generational power-struggle. It's a story built on ancient myth and legends of humanity.
• A story that connects Holy Blood, 2012, Nano-technology, Artificial Intelligence and the worlds oldest and most powerful secret society with the great Mysteries of Egypt...
• These are the subject-matter of many of the most successful films AND books ever produced. But no book or film has brought them together quite like PHARAOH.
• It draws on some of the most basic and fundamentals of Hollywood Blockbusters but spices and shakes them so well they taste totally fresh and new...
• It's controversial. It will get people talking. Much like “The Da Vinci Code” and “Holy Blood, Holy Grail” did… But it’s no more ‘out there’ than what is already shown on TV (the History Channel) and in other classic blockbusters.
•A classic hero's journey, similar to 'The Matrix' -- an outsider being brought in to save the world from the powers that be.
•An 'Indiana Jones' adventure that gradually unfolds. It uses and dives into popular cultures religious symbolism and conjecture.
PHARAOH is full of symbolism, but neither promotes nor denounces any religion or science. Rather, it incorporates both as part of the human experience and part of the story...
A story about secrets… Secrets we are all dying to know. Secrets that millions of people all over the world love to hear, see and talk about. Making this script:
"The most imaginative (potentially lucrative) un-produced Epic Trilogy since 'Star Wars' for whomever has the guts to make it!"
I know it will turn some people off; but it will also turn the right person on.
Someone -- with access to capital and a vision for the project -- will be turned on, because they will read the script and they'll realize it's true > PEOPLE WILL LOVE THE STORY.
This script has all the ingredients of a blockbuster film.
IT IS EXACTLY WHAT HOLLYWOOD IS LOOKING FOR.
Why?
Because it's what THE AUDIENCE is looking for.
How so?
Well... What defines the success of many films today is: CULT FOLLOWING
Whether it's Twilight, Comic-Books, Sex and the City, or The Da Vinci Code.
Success comes from tapping into and drawing out that base, that "cult following". By creating a product that appeals to them, and they will buy. They go/buy because it's something that they know a little about, and they want to see and weigh in on, or be a part of...
PHARAOH has just that. Stuff people are interested in and follow with cult like dedication and interest.
How so?
An inherently multi-prong approach. It deals with, and taps some of the largest and most lucrative cult-followings that are consuming media products today. Comic-book and Fantasy appeal in the youth. Intellectual controversy, speculation and religious symbolism appeal in the adults. It taps the more discerning >> the crowd that doesn't go out and see every movie, but they will when it's about something that interests them...
The subject matter of PHARAOH has been the interest of young, old, poor and royalty... for over a 1000 years. Global appeal today. It would play well in every world market, because it's subject matter is universal.
What subject matter?
Secrets • Hidden History • Humanity, mortality and Eternal Life...
And more recently:
-- What happens when computer intelligence becomes greater that human intelligence "the Singularity".
-- How does Artificial Intelligence come to be?
PHARAOH actually connects all these questions and answers into a thrill ride of 133 pages. As they say: You think you know... but you have no idea…
Okay fine. Huge cult following of those subjects. Lots of movies. Millions of books on those subjects are sold annually. Got it. But how does that translate into these 'cult-followings' buying into your script?
PHARAOH offers fascinating and fantastic answers to these questions. Questions people are paying money to read, hear and see answers too,
As a film it becomes a powerful new kind of entertainment, a kind of postmodern religious experience. Something people pay good money for...
PHARAOH creates a mythos out of our (neo) real world, in the way that Lord of the Rings is a mythos of pre-industrial Europe. It creates a world where fantasy is the reality...
It would be visually and intellectually stimulating --perfect to be made in and utilize 3-D -- which makes it stronger cinematically, and more moving / enjoyable.
'The Dark Knight' was deep and engrossing because it felt plausible, realistic -- intellectually stimulating.
With the rate the world is changing, we are confronted daily with concepts and ideas that seem crazy, but we are learning are actually becoming real. FAST. Things like AI, cloning, and Secret Societies... Hence a new reality.
Neo-realism > "new-realism" > new way of looking at and projecting reality
People want NEO-REAL and the neo-realism of today is... Fantasy.
Think AVATAR. It pretends to be the real world -- our actual future -- and it uses the story to take this "real world" or neo-real-world to a place of fantasy. The fantasy is the reality, the reality where we are exploring other realities... Get it? Doesn't matter, because the point is:
People love it.
Why do they love it? Because it's a deeper movie going experience when you connect to it. People feel they got more out of it when they connect -- like it was worth the money and they want to have the experience again... and also buy the DVD.
Some people say: "it was the cutting edge visual effects that got them in, not the subject matter."
True. But the effects are only as good as the story that employs them. Many films with the best visual effects but no story find little success. But the ones that can truly utilize and showcase cutting edge technology within the context of a great story find true Blockbuster "cult following" success. Think ‘The Matrix’ and the Renaissance in Super-hero movies it created in Hollywood.
When a great story, can utilize great effects, the combined effect magnifies the profitability/marketability. The impact and selling power of it is much stronger.
It takes a good story to begin with...
PHARAOH is a good story.
Once you read it, you understand why it's
"The most imaginative (potentially lucrative) un-produced Epic Trilogy since 'Star Wars' for whomever has the guts to make it!"
See also:
http://mr-postmodernistic.blogspot.com/2010/08/pharaoh-pitch-2.html
Posted by
Postmodernism
at
2:28 PM
0
comments
Thursday, March 11, 2010
The Market for Pharaoh got better...
>> Da Vinci is best known as the painter behind "Mona Lisa" and "The Last Supper," though he also was an inventor, engineer, architect, mathematician among many other occupations. The project re-imagines Da Vinci as a member of a secret society who falls headlong into a supernatural adventure that pits the man against Biblical demons in a story involving secret codes, lost civilizations, hidden fortresses and fallen angels. Think "National Treasure" and "Raiders of the Lost Ark" by way of "Clash of the Titans." <<
Title: "Leonardo da Vinci and the Soldiers of Forever"
What do you think?
Well...
Warner Bros. just bought it as a treatment.
http://www.heatvisionblog.com/2010/0...medium=twitter
I think the market for my script/story just got better! After all I would love to see that film made. Sounds really interesting. That is what millions of people out there are looking for in cinema. There should be lots of films in that model…
And I actually have a completed script and almost completed treatment for two more! I am currently finalizing a draft of “Part 1” for the Nicholl's Fellowship April 1st Deadline.
But this turn of events got me thinking...
In light of this development, I have decided to explore going out with my script and concept right now.
* * * Open letter * * *
Dear Competing Hollywood Studios (Especially you Disney!),
I feel the time has come, to roll out more of my story and concept. The market is moving in a new direction, and I humbly offer a vehicle going just that way. A trail blazing script...
First I must say, I love this new direction Hollywood is taking. This exploration of new technologies, and new ideas in cinema. We can make anything we can imagine these days, and we can do it really well. Whether it's exploring new worlds on 'Pandora' in Avatar, or as in the case of my script “Pharaoh” which explores the ancient world (in all it's glory), the future (and all we imagine it to be), and a fantastic Futuristic Antiquity we only dream of…
>> Warners seems eager to make more projects involving a period setting, a historical figure and the fantastical. Last week, the studio picked up a pitch that has Francis Lawrence attached to direct a supernatural tale featuring explorer Marco Polo, and it's back in business with "Holmes" director Guy Ritchie on a King Arthur project. <<
Other smart Studios are on to this as well.
Enter my script…
Pharaoh
The Da Vinci Code meets The Matirx by way of Avatar / Alice in Wonderland (created dynamic, colorful, beautiful worlds).
Elements of Lord of the Rings and Minority Report
A Professor "David" researching the Pyramids in Egypt stumbles into a secret so profound it changes the world forever. He is tapped by the Leader of 'The Order' --the most powerful secret society on Earth, to find the truth about this secret, this artifact called the 'Aton' (The Ark of the Covenant and the Holy Grail rolled into one). David and his family become caught in the generational power struggle within the Order, for control of the world and of humanity. The power hungry Son of the Leader "Darius" orchestrates a Coup, takes over the Order and sets off a chain reaction of events that creates: Artificial Intelligence. A.I. will destroy humanity as we know it if something is not done. Humanity has one hope: "The Pharaoh". He can be brought back by using the Aton and David figures out how. But David is not in a position to get this monumental task of bringing the Pharaoh back accomplished. David has been compromised by mind control technology and an unlikely Hero emerges from within the Order to help. The Leader’s Grandson steps in and takes over the project to get the Pharaoh cloned / born. He must now save David, and the world, and if the secrets are true; he can.
Part 1 of 3
Breakdown:
40% - The Da Vinci Code
30% - The Matrix
10% - Minority Report
10% - James Bond
9% - Stargate
1% - Lord of the Rings
***
This story incorporates ancient mysteries, conspiracy theories, cutting edge science and religious symbolism to create a world of intrigue and wonder. A world where fantasy is the reality…
People want to understand reality, they want to explore it, and if you can "suspend your disbelief" easily, it makes a film more enjoyable, the impact that much stronger and the experience that much more moving and entertaining.
This story gets the benefit of controversial topics, while avoiding any sort of defamation to religion, science, individuals or groups. It manages to stay politically/religiously fair and neutral while still being ground breaking and cutting edge in it’s detail, content and structure.
The story emphaisises the ideas of global unity and explores the human experience of all races, creeds and cultures since the beginning of civilization. It’s a story with global appeal and universal themes.
It will stir up great interest and get free publicity a la “Passion of the Christ” and “The Da Vinci Code” but it is not shocking or divisive. It’s only message is that the world is a fantastic place.
Blending ‘comic book’ and super-hero style fantasy with historical ideas and events gives the story a feeling of realism, but the fun of being larger than life.
It’s like The Matrix in that it’s about one mans journey into a world he never expected, though he suspected it was there. A world where the rules and ways he thought were immovable, are actually not even real.
‘The Da Vinci Code’ was about Holy Blood and the secrets and dangers that surround it. This story takes this concept to a whole new level, expanding and exploring it from the ancient past to the future. The story explores the mythos of secret societies. futuristic antiquities and the future.
It creates a mythos out of the modern world, similar to how 'Lord of the Rings' is a mythos of pre-industrial Europe. The details of the mythos are deep and constructed to be multi-interpretive for everyone. They are fine if taken at surface value, but can hold weight if you press them, they are universal human ideals.
It has elements of ‘Minority Report’, in that it goes into the future where machines and minds are merging and what happens to us when this occurs.
I drew on elements of Star Wars, including the ideas of secret ‘Brotherhoods’ (like the Jedi) that guard over civilization.
‘Stargate’ is another classic film that plays on the unsolved mysteries of Egypt and begins with the premiss that the Sphinx is far older than history tells us. My story begins with a similar premiss: There is more to the pyramids than we thought.
Egyptian History is shrouded in mystery… and that is why it’s so interesting. That’s why you see Egyptian symbols all over the world and in countless Hollywood blockbusters including the recent ‘Transformers 2’. This subject is great for Hollywood because it is recognizable all over the world = $$$
‘The Mummy’ was hugely successful because it was great story and people love all things Egypt. It also blened biblical legend and fantasy beautifully. My script does the same thing.
My script would make the perfect 3-D film! It explores not only fantasy ancient worlds, but also the future. Tons of room for effects innovation in this story. With a real and deep universal story and 'Avatar' style effects and sequences this project would be a huge success; I know it.
Because the film would be so story and effects driven, it could be done with relatively unknown actors. But there are some great parts written just for rising stars.
Pharaoh is a 'James Bond' style action adventure --jetting all over the world, and would take the audience to places they always dreamed existed, and awlays wanted to see.
An 'Indiana Jones' adventure but with a grown up story and a grounding in factual reality to truly dazzle the even most discerning of minds. Yet the story is still simple enough on the surface to be enjoyed by all ages.
Being grounded in reality; i.e. feeling more realistic, or neo-realistic, is definitely the trend these days. 'Batman: The Dark Knight' is a good example of this, whereas "Batman and Robin" was not grounded in any sort of reality at all.
So my point is:
The market is ready for this story.
I'm a new writer, but I'm not new to Hollywood. I have followed the markets and trends religiously for the past 8 years. I have developed a keen sense of where things are going. I'm new, but so is the technology, and this new wave/direction. Hollywood thrives on new blood and new ideas. I have tons.
"Pharaoh" is a story that is ahead of it's time, but that's perfect because, when it comes out in two years it will be right on time! You gotta think ahead (all you Hollywood studios)... things are starting to move fast. And only shows signs of accelerating...
It’s an exciting time to be in show biz.
A completed polished script ready to be read:
pomofilms@gmail.com
Email me if you want to see some pages.
Thoughts?
***
See Also: http://mr-postmodernistic.blogspot.com/2010/04/pharaoh-pitch.html
Posted by
Postmodernism
at
12:36 PM
0
comments
Monday, February 8, 2010
Review: Avatar
![]()
Dazzling. Detailed. 'Classic Cameron'. Predictable. Futuristic.
I went into this film skeptical. I had the same feeling before seeing Titanic: "Why does it take so much money to make a film?"
But then I went and saw the movie. Then I it all made sense. James Cameron may have a reputation for having an ego and for being a tyrant on set, but in the end his end justifies his means. Like him or not, you have to respect the art, the achievement.
The film is in fact quite a cinematic achievement. Film technology just keeps getting better and better, and Avatar takes the medium a big leap forward. The technology is literally opening new worlds.
Avatar is about exploring new worlds. It's about blending worlds together, and that is exactly what Cameron has done in the story and with the technology. Very clever. The imagery is beautiful to look at. The details are there, and the realism is palpable. I actually really like the whole concept of building the alien body and then inhabiting it. But the basic story of the film is very simple, timeless if not basic. I agree it is a sort of "Ferngully" but they put a twist on it. I will say, the environmentalist in me got all emotional when they blew up the tree... really got me.
I would say this film is very worthy of the Oscar for Best Picture. I used to think there were things I didn't like about James Cameron, like that you don't need to be a tyrant to get things done. But I have come to see that sometimes seeing your vision through can take time, and it can rub people the wrong way, or take ten years to make a film. But in the end that's how things get done; by forcing them along, by seeking perfection, and by keeping people and production in line. I am full of respect for people that have a vision and that follow it through. Well done, Mr. Cameron, well done.
The movie is good.
Posted by
Postmodernism
at
4:35 PM
0
comments
Monday, February 1, 2010
Review: An Education

An Education
Educational. Witty. Simple. Heartfelt. Compelling.
I enjoyed this movie. It was the perfect length, the perfect pace, and very well written. It’s about a girl who learns the hard way why education is so important. She gets an education on life, when she realizes the man she was going to give up her Oxford education for was not who he said he was. Simple, solid, and interesting.
The actors in it all did an excellent job. Carey Mulligan especially stood out for me. I think she is Oscar worthy. Her timing was great, and her performance, for me, felt genuine and real. All the rest of the cast did very good as well.
Movies like this are great for their ability to help us learn a lesson with the character. I felt I learned something I kinda already knew: Education comes first
Good movie. Good Message.
I liked it.
Posted by
Postmodernism
at
2:37 PM
0
comments
Saturday, January 30, 2010
Artist need to be taken Seriously!
I found this from my Cousins Facebook page:
Reposted from ashwings' LJ which was reposted from CraigsList
This would be directed more toward people on devArt but I figure it's good to post this everywhere. This is for anyone who ever asked me for a "free" commission.
--------------------------------------------------
Craig's PISSED
Every day, there are more and more Craigs List posts seeking "artists" for everything from auto graphics to comic books to corporate logo designs. More people are finding themselves in need of some form of illustrative service.
But what they’re NOT doing, unfortunately, is realizing how rare someone with these particular talents can be.
To those who are "seeking artists", let me ask you; How many people do you know, personally, with the talent and skill to perform the services you need? A dozen? Five? One? …none?
More than likely, you don’t know any. Otherwise, you wouldn’t be posting on craigslist to find them.
And this is not really a surprise.
In this country, there are almost twice as many neurosurgeons as there are professional illustrators. There are eleven times as many certified mechanics. There are SEVENTY times as many people in the IT field.
So, given that they are less rare, and therefore less in demand, would it make sense to ask your mechanic to work on your car for free? Would you look him in the eye, with a straight face, and tell him that his compensation would be the ability to have his work shown to others as you drive down the street?
Would you offer a neurosurgeon the “opportunity” to add your name to his resume as payment for removing that pesky tumor? (Maybe you could offer him “a few bucks” for “materials”. What a deal!)
Would you be able to seriously even CONSIDER offering your web hosting service the chance to have people see their work, by viewing your website, as their payment for hosting you?
If you answered “yes” to ANY of the above, you’re obviously insane. If you answered “no”, then kudos to you for living in the real world.
But then tell me… why would you think it is okay to live out the same, delusional, ridiculous fantasy when seeking someone whose abilities are even less in supply than these folks?
Graphic artists, illustrators, painters, etc., are skilled tradesmen. As such, to consider them as, or deal with them as, anything less than professionals fully deserving of your respect is both insulting and a bad reflection on you as a sane, reasonable person. In short, it makes you look like a twit.
A few things you need to know;
1. It is not a “great opportunity” for an artist to have his work seen on your car/’zine/website/bedroom wall, etc. It IS a “great opportunity” for YOU to have their work there.
2. It is not clever to seek a “student” or “beginner” in an attempt to get work for free. It’s ignorant and insulting. They may be “students”, but that does not mean they don’t deserve to be paid for their hard work. You were a “student” once, too. Would you have taken that job at McDonalds with no pay, because you were learning essential job skills for the real world? Yes, your proposition it JUST as stupid.
3. The chance to have their name on something that is going to be seen by other people, whether it’s one or one million, is NOT a valid enticement. Neither is the right to add that work to their “portfolio”. They get to do those things ANYWAY, after being paid as they should. It’s not compensation. It’s their right, and it’s a given.
4. Stop thinking that you’re giving them some great chance to work. Once they skip over your silly ad, as they should, the next ad is usually for someone who lives in the real world, and as such, will pay them. There are far more jobs needing these skills than there are people who possess these skills.
5. Students DO need “experience”. But they do NOT need to get it by giving their work away. In fact, this does not even offer them the experience they need. Anyone who will not/can not pay them is obviously the type of person or business they should be ashamed to have on their resume anyway. Do you think professional contractors list the “experience” they got while nailing down a loose step at their grandmother’s house when they were seventeen?
If you your company or gig was worth listing as desired experience, it would be able to pay for the services it received. The only experience they will get doing free work for you is a lesson learned in what kinds of scrubs they should not lower themselves to deal with.
6. (This one is FOR the artists out there, please pay attention.) Some will ask you to “submit work for consideration”. They may even be posing as some sort of “contest”. These are almost always scams. They will take the work submitted by many artists seeking to win the “contest”, or be “chosen” for the gig, and find what they like most. They will then usually have someone who works for them, or someone who works incredibly cheap because they have no originality or talent of their own, reproduce that same work, or even just make slight modifications to it, and claim it as their own. You will NOT be paid, you will NOT win the contest. The only people who win, here, are the underhanded folks who run these ads. This is speculative, or “spec”, work. It’s risky at best, and a complete scam at worst. I urge you to avoid it, completely. For more information on this subject, please visit www.no-spec.com.
So to artists/designers/illustrators looking for work, do everyone a favor, ESPECIALLY yourselves, and avoid people who do not intend to pay you. Whether they are “spec” gigs, or just some guy who wants a free mural on his living room walls. They need you. You do NOT need them.
And for those who are looking for someone to do work for free… please wake up and join the real world. The only thing you’re accomplishing is to insult those with the skills you need. Get a clue.
Posted by
Postmodernism
at
1:25 PM
0
comments
Thursday, January 28, 2010
State of the Union 2010
STATE OF THE UNION
President Obama
27 January 2010
These are my thoughts as I watched it...
***
There is no such thing as a perfect senator.
I hate the Sarah Palin, Mike Huckaby, types. Politics is supposed to be about making change, not celebrity. When the focus shifts to Celebrity not creating benificial policy I have a problem. Don’t use donations to enrich your life, and leave them SOL.
Obama said “no rewarding bad behaviour”.
Great spirit, and decent.
Nobody liked the bailout. Analogy to a root canal was perfect. Painful, horrible to go through, but it can save the tooth.
Our union is strong. The people are the union. The people are strong.
People are like a union, and the Fed is like the boss. Time to renegotiate the contract.
A fee on the biggest banks is a great idea. “Meltdown insurance” is more than fair.
I like that Obama keeps it real. So refreshing.
“Jobs Bill” This could be awesome. How about things like local beautification artists? How about state/city gardens to grow food for shelters.
The government can be very creative in problem solving. It can even print money.
Small business is key. I would love to have one myself.
America is way behind on “green” initiatives and mass transportation. Time to cut all the red tape and get the systems built! Bullet trains, metros, and infrastructure.
America should not put its future on hold. No more waiting. America failing or falling from it’s vast lead over every other nation would be an “allowing”. We must not allow it.
Time to bring out the clean (free) energy. It will be a great for/in America when that happens. America needs more energy so why not have it be free?
No – no – no! I am morally opposed to any more drilling. No new rigs or wells. We do not need anymore energy from dirty oil. No drilling in untouched places. No drilling in places like Santa Barbara until the old rigs and spills are actually cleaned up. If they keep the original promises they do not deserve our trust again.
If people are going to spend billions to TRY and reach really deep oil, without guarentee. We would be much better off to spend billions to create GUARENTEED free energy (wind, solar, ect) that is sustainable and clean.
Schools… don’t get me started.
Don’t reward failure!!!
Our schools have failed, so we must improve our community colleges to help the people that primary school failed.
Tax breaks for college education/funding. Great idea. “No one should go broke because they chose to go to college.”
I’m so glad to not have a mortgage on a house worth less than I paid.
We need healthcare reform. Keep the lobbyists out. Problem is not going away. Congress can not walk away. Any congress member who fails us on Healthcare Reform must not be re-elected. Healthcare must be addressed and fixed!
Is the prescription drug bill what messed up healthcare? It didn’t make people healthier, didn’t save anyone money, cost the Gov billions it did not have. Disasterous! At all levels. It made the system sick.
Creative solutions…. Not more money.
We must not do what we did the last 8 years. It failed us. Washington must change it’s ways. If it can’t the people must change Washington. One person at a time…
Deficit of trust (last 8 years). End lobbyists. I want real government or I want a new government.
Control of lobbyists is essential. Time to weed out those that take money from lobbyists and pass spending bills at the expense of the people.
“Creepy” law the Supreme Court passed. Foreign enemies(?)
Publish all earmarks online. Must be published at least a week prior to vote! Great idea.
Congress must settle partisan differences. No behaving like every day is election day. Job description is not to work toward election day.
Why do politicians not have the courage to do what needs to be done despite it being unpopular? I want real leadership. I want politicians who can get things done!
We need politicians who get things done. Out with those who don’t. That goes for state, city and local politicians too.
No more thinking “if you lose – I win”. We should all be helping eachother succeed. The success of your neighbor is your success.
Out with blockers. No more blocking just because you can. We need action. We need to get things moving. Improving.
There is a wonderful Entertaining element about Obama.
Still need to govern. That goes for all.
No running for the hills. Time to work. Politicians must serve citizens.. not personal ambitions. Help solve people and America’s problems or get out of the way.
There is way too much change / efficiency / effectiveness that needs to be achieved.
Obama has great personality. I love that he meets with all. Great idea.
Security… Uh oh. The threats to America are vast and scary.
Better future for America equals better world.
The Joint Chiefs of Staff looked skeptical.
Arms control is so necessary… so scary. Nukes are never good.
Our destiny is connected to the world’s.
Had to mention Haiti. Haiti is an example of how America can and must help the world. The world needs America’s help, and leadership.
America must stand on the side of freedom and human dignity.
Obama was correct with immigration. People must play by the rules.
Values built America. Not “Jersey Shore” mentalities. America needs its values back.
We must not tear each other down. We need to help each other.
Change is never easy when it’s not instant, and is hard even when it is.
Don’t avoid the hard truths. Do what’s best for next generation.
Keep dream alive.
The spirit of America is in us – and is strong.
“I don’t quit.”
God bless America.
Posted by
Postmodernism
at
2:23 PM
0
comments
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
CA Budget Crisis and Building Prisons in Mexico
Should Schwarzenegger Send California Prisoners to Mexico?
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has an idea to ease prison overcrowding and help the state's beleaguered budget in one fell swoop -- send inmates to Mexico. Schwarzenegger proposes building prisons in Mexico to house the 20,000 illegal immigrants currently behind bars in California.
"Think about it -- if California gives Mexico the money. Not 'Hey, you take care of them, these are your citizens'. No. Not at all." He told the Sacramento Press Club Monday. "We pay them to build the prison down in Mexico. And then we have those undocumented immigrants down there in prison. It would half the costs to build the prison and run the prison. We could save a billion dollars right there that could go into higher education."
Do you think this is a good idea?
***
The simple answer is yes and here is why...
1) Housing prisoners in CA cost about $40,000 per inmate, per year. This is insane and must change immediately. Building prisons in Mexico is a solution to this problem.
2) The cost is largely due to prison Unions and guards making over $100K per year. In Mexico we could offer guards $20K a year and they would be lining up for the jobs. It's time to break the choke hold of these unions on CA. This would address this problem. It would allow us to weaken the power of these unions.
3) Detaining illegal immigrants in CA is not practical, and is a huge waste of money. It makes sense to deport them to a place where CA and the Federal Government knows and trusts; especially if they are dangerous. After all the reason we don't just turn them over to the Mexican authorities is because we want to make sure they are incarcerated. We want to make sure they don't just get released and then come back into the US (which they currently do).
4) The Prisons in Mexico would serve a dual purpose, as a prison, and a detention / processing center for illegal immigrants deported from the US. Whenever an illegal immigrant is arrested here in CA (or any state) they would immediately be sent to one of these prisons/centers. There they will be processed, tried in a Mexican or US (or combo) court and sentenced. No more detaining illegals in the US. Ship them out immediately. People that are not Mexican could be deported elsewhere from this center as well; once their term is complete.
5) This would be a great way to team up with Mexico to address this immigration problem. We would be providing them with long-term jobs, and boost their economy while also helping our own security. It's a win win.
6) These prisons would be a joint venture between The Fed, States, and Mexico. Because the illegal immigration problem is a Federal and State issue, both would be involved in these prisons. Funding would come from both the Fed and the State. The Fed will be in charge of the tracking of illegals and submitting criminal records to immigration, local police and to all parties involved in determining citizenship eligibility. We also need to be tracking fugitives of the Mexican government that find there way into America, we need to know to detain them if they are picked up.
BOTTOM LINE: We need to be working with Mexico on this problem on way or another.
Posted by
Postmodernism
at
3:26 PM
0
comments
Monday, January 25, 2010
They said what???
43 Things Actually Said in Job Interviews
By Rachel Zupek, CareerBuilder.com writer
Find Jobs
"I'm not wanted in this state."
"How many young women work here?"
"I didn't steal it; I just borrowed it."
"You touch somebody and they call it sexual harassment!"
"I've never heard such a stupid question."
Believe it or not, the above statements weren't overheard in bars or random conversations -- they were said in job interviews.
Maybe you were nervous, you thought the employer would appreciate your honesty, or maybe you just have no boundaries. Whatever the reason, you can be certain that you shouldn't tell an interviewer that it's probably best if he doesn't do a background check on you. (And yes, the hiring manager remembered you said that.)
We asked hiring managers to share the craziest things they've heard from applicants in an interview. Some are laugh-out-loud hysterical, others are jaw-dropping -- the majority are both. They will relieve anyone who has ever said something unfortunate at a job interview -- and simply amuse the rest of you.
Hiring managers shared these 43 memorable interview responses:
Why did you leave your last job?
"I have a problem with authority." - Carrie Rocha, chief operating officer, HousingLink
Tell us about a problem you had with a co-worker and how you resolved it
"The resolution was we were both fired." - Jason Shindler, CEO, Curvine Web Solutions
What kind of computer software have you used?
"Computers? Are those the black boxes that sit on the floor next to the desks? My boss has one of those. He uses it. I don't have one. He just gives me my schedule and I follow it." - Greg Szymanski, director of human resources, Geonerco Management Inc.
What are your hobbies and interests?
"[He said] 'Well, as you can see, I'm a young, virile man and I'm single -- if you ladies know what I'm saying.' Then he looked at one of the fair-haired board members and said, 'I particularly like blondes.'" - Petri R.J. Darby, president, darbyDarnit Public Relations
Why should we hire you?
"I would be a great asset to the events team because I party all the time." - Bill McGowan, founder, Clarity Media Group
Do you have any questions?
"Cross-dressing isn't a problem is it?" - Barry Maher, Barry Maher & Associates
"If you were a fruit, what fruit would you be?" - Megan Garnett, Articulate Leadership Team, Articulate Communications Inc.
"What do you want me to do if I cannot walk to work if it's raining? Can you pick me up?" - Christine Pechstein, career coach
"I was a chamber of commerce executive once hiring a secretary. [The candidate asked] 'What does a chamber of commerce do?'" - Mary Kurek, Mary Kurek Inc. Visibility Consulting
"Can we wrap this up fairly quickly? I have someplace I have to go." - Bruce Campbell, vice president of marketing, Clare Computer Solutions
"What is your company's policy on Monday absences?" - Campbell
"If this doesn't work out can I call you to go out sometime?" - Christine Bolzan, founder of Graduate Career Coaching
"How big do the bonuses really get once you make associate? I hear it's some serious cash." - Bolzan
"[The candidate asked,] 'Can my dad call you to talk about the job and the training program? He is really upset I'm not going to medical school and wants someone to explain the Wall Street path to him.' The dad did call. Then that dad's friends called and I ended up doing a conference call with a group of concerned parents ... long story." - Bolzan
"If I get an offer, how long do I have before I have to take the drug test?" - Bolzan
"When you do background checks on candidates, do things like public drunkenness arrests come up?" - Bolzan
"Can I get a tour of the breast pumping room? I heard you have a great one here and while I don't plan on having children for at least 10 or 12 years, I will definitely breast-feed and would want to use that room."- Bolzan
"So, how much do they pay you for doing these interviews?" - Jodi R.R. Smith, Mannersmith Etiquette Consulting
Why are you leaving your current job?
"Because I (expletive) my pants every time I enter the building." - Abbe Mortimore, human resources manager, True Textiles Inc.
"I was fired from my last job because they were forcing me to attend anger management classes." - Smith
Why are you looking for a job?
"Cigarettes are getting more expensive, so I need another job." - Pechstein
"My parents told me I need to get a job so that is why I'm here." - McGowan
Why do you want to work for us?
"Just for the benefits." - Jennifer Juergens, JJ Communications
"My old boss didn't like me, so one day, I just left and never came back. And here I am!" - Matt Cowall, communications manager, Appia Communications
"I saw the job posted on Twitter and thought, why not?" - Rebecca Gertsmark Oren, communications director at The Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity
What are your assets? (as in strengths)
"Well, I do own a bike." - Pam Venné, principal, The Venné Group
What are your weaknesses?
"I get angry easily and I went to jail for domestic violence. But I won't get mad at you." - Pechstein
"I had a job candidate tell me that she often oversleeps and has trouble getting out of bed in the morning." - Linda Yaffe, certified executive coach
"I am an alcoholic and do not deserve this job." - Deb Bailey, owner, Power Women Magazine & Radio Show
"I'm really not a big learner. You know ... some people love learning and are always picking up new things, but that's just not me. I'd much rather work at a place where the job is pretty stagnant and doesn't change a lot." - Michaele Charles, Voice Communications
When have you demonstrated leadership skills?
"Well my best example would be in the world of online video gaming. I pretty much run the show; it takes a lot to do that." - Rachel Croce
Is there anything else I should know about you?
"You should probably know I mud wrestle on the weekends." -- Venné
When can you start?
"I need to check with my mom on that one." - Bolzan
Use three adjectives to describe yourself
"I hate questions like this." - Katrina Meistering
Tell of a time you made a mistake and how you dealt with it
"I stole some equipment from my old job, and I had to pay for its replacement." - Meistering
Have you submitted your two weeks' notice to your current employer?
"What is two weeks' notice? I've never quit a job before, I've always been fired." - Meistering
Random responses
"One guy [said] 'it would probably be best' if I didn't run a background check on him. Of course, I did, and learned all about his long, sordid past of law-breaking. Our client actually offered him a job as a staff accountant, but quickly retracted the offer when I had to tell them all about his recent arrest for a meth lab in his basement." - Charles
"[A] guy said he did not have a mailing address, as he was living in a gypsy camp at the airport." - Sandra L. Flippo, SPHR
"I went into the lobby to pick up a candidate. As he stood up, his trousers fell to the floor! [He said] 'Oh, my gosh -- they told me I needed a suit for the interview. I've got no money -- so I borrowed this thing. It's too big!'" - Beth Ross, executive and career coach
"Wow -- I'm not used to wearing dress shoes! My feet are killing me. Can I show you these bloody blisters?" - Bolzan
"May I have a cup of coffee? I think I may still be a little drunk from last night." - Smith
(During a telephone call to schedule the interview) "Can we meet next month? I am currently incarcerated." - Smith
"[A candidate] was asked whether he could advocate impartially on behalf of the various universities he would be representing since he had attended one of them. He responded, 'Well, I don't like to poop where I eat, but I thought my education sucked, so I certainly wouldn't put that school above the others.'" - Darby
Posted by
Postmodernism
at
1:10 PM
0
comments
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Review: Up in the Air
Witty. Dark. Timely/Topical. Funny. Interesting...
I would call this film: Satisfyingly Unfulfilling
I very much enjoyed this film. I found it original, smart, real, fun and well done. Reitman's vision came through nicely it would seem, albeit I gather recent events gave the film a darker edge. Had the global economy not crashed and millions of people were not actually going through what goes on in the film, it would have been more comical. Instead, getting fired, or losing your job is not comedy to most in 2009 - 2010. It made the film much cheaper to make if that makes you feel better. Lots of abandoned offices to film in...
The film is dark in that way, and also in another way. I actually think the world that the George Clooney character lives in is actually quite dark as well. An impersonal, sterile, and fake world devoid of closeness and love. In the film the George Clooney character seems to like it... but all I kept thinking is "my god how could you eat airplane food 322 days a year???"
Everyone in this film did a very good job. The people getting fired in all.
Vera Farmiga is amazing. Her performance was perfect for me.
Anna Kendrick also was great. She has great timing, delivery and expression.
All in all the film was good, but the fact that it was left uncompleted or 'up in the air' is both annoying and perfect. Ryan (the GC character) does not find resolution, or rather, his resolution is 'Up in the Air'.
Posted by
Postmodernism
at
11:23 AM
0
comments
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Simple fix for LA scavengers
Los Angeles has a major problem with scavengers. People that dig through peoples trash to find recyclables. This is against the law, yet the state encourages it by giving people money to do.
Why would the state encourage such bad behavior?
The people that do this are generally also:
Trespassing - Going onto peoples property to dig through their trash
Littering - Throwing trash on the ground as they dig
Unsanitary - ripping open trash bags and spreading germs and disease
Loud - they slam trash cans in the middle of the night, trop through neighborhoods
Thieves - many have stolen shopping carts they collect cans in. Plus they are stealing from the state recycle programs
Illegal Immigrants - Many of the scavengers are here illegally.
People claim they use this money to survive, but the harsh reality is at least half use it for drugs.
Food and shelter are available to those that need it. There are soup kitchens and shelters throughout the city.
Many politicians don't seem to know what to do about the problem. The news stories, show interviews with overpaid 'do-nothings' who talk and talk and do nothing. I'm sick to death of it, and of those people.
THE WAY TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM IS SIMPLE
SOLUTION: End the cash rebate for recyclables!!!
It's so simple.
People will stop digging through the trash if they don't get money for doing it!
The state can still collect the CRV, and can use the money it collects to increase the funding to Homeless shelters, and soup kitchens, and halfway houses.
Then the state will also get millions (billions?) more in revenue as the recycling they collect quadruples. California sorts all it's trash already so they can get all the recyclables out if they are in the trash. This can encourage more recycling and give money to any other needy group affected by the ending of cash handouts.
What about the kids?
Kids can collect recyclables and turn them over to the schools who can get money for them. This helps the schools and the kids.
We don't need to give out cash to encourage recycling anymore. This is no longer helping society, it's hurting it.
Time to tackle the problem head on.
Posted by
Postmodernism
at
10:43 AM
0
comments
Labels: California, LA, Postmodernism, Recycling, Scavengers
Monday, November 16, 2009
Movie Review: 2012
Entertainingly implausible.
Fast and Fun, with amazing special effects, but as I thought way over the top on the plausibility scale.
But then again this film was not meant to be plausible. It is designed to put you right into the action, and thrill even if that means total suspension of belief. But after a while you forget that the escapes achieved could NEVER happen, and just get lost in the visual spectacle.
The script was not as bad as I thought. The basic premise is that in 2012 the poles shift and this destroys the world. While there is scientific basis for this they make it feel pretty fantastic. If the poles did change all communication would be lost instantly. People would also all become disoriented, because we also depend on the Earth's magnetic field for our brains to function properly. But this would not make for a good movie...
Aside from the special effects, I found this film very formulaic, and predictable. But when you spend +$200 million you prob don't want to take many artistic risks. This is your classic disaster film.
All in all I thought it was enjoyable.
Posted by
Postmodernism
at
9:50 AM
0
comments
Letter to the Addiction Fighter
Letter to the Addiction Fighter
I am a little worried about you. It’s hard to see you fall of the wagon. You know I care about you, and I will always be your friend, and that’s why I can tell you this. Its not easy to hear, but it’s necessary. I noticed you were acting a little strange, and so did many other people at your birthday. Your friends don’t like to see you fall off the wagon and it makes you harder to be around. I like the sober you, and I’m not the only one. You are so much fun, but that all gets lost when you drink or take drugs. I know it’s hard, I’ve been there.
I know you feel like you are missing out when you don’t drink or use. You feel like everyone is having fun but you. But you have to realize that the opposite is actually true. Fun is a state of mind that you can have without drugs or alcohol. Part of growing up, and getting older is realizing that binge drinking is not actually real fun. Drugs are not a sustainable source of pleasure. Once you become dependent on them you are in for a world of pain. You have to move on from them, or you will never be happy. Drugs are destructive, dangerous, and they age you and it keep you from being in touch with yourself and others. If you had to take the downside of drugs before you got the upside, no one would ever take them! I have found that I have only truly experienced fun in situations where drugs and alcohol are not involved. Like connecting and hanging out with friends: good food, hiking, bike riding, conversation and games. Drugs sometimes seem or act like a bonding agent between friends, but drugs prevent actual bonding. Friendships based on drugs never last and are not real. Your real friends are the friends who you (can) connect with sober.
When you are addicted to something, it takes time to find that place of sober contentment. It takes work too. No one says it’s easy. But once you do, you will live a longer, more fulfilling life. You will connect better with people, and you will develop deeper more meaningful relationships. You will learn better, see clearer, and have more energy. Drugs and alcohol prevent you (and everyone) from finding that place of real connection. Connection with yourself, your true feelings, and then connection with others. That is what life is all about. That is what will lead you to true lasting happiness.
The longer you have been abusing something, the longer it will take to break yourself of the addiction to it. A stretch of TOTAL sobriety (don’t transfer your addictions from one substance to another, that doesn’t accomplish anything) is necessary to clear the mind; to find that “moment of clarity”. You need to find that inner peace and strength. We all have it. Some of us just burry it very deep; sometimes under a mountain of ‘lies and emotions’. The more we abuse and lie to ourselves the more digging and soul searching is required to find our true self, our inner peace.
If for years you develop your brain to find pleasure in drugs/alcohol, this wiring of the brain is not easily undone. It takes work. It takes time. But it is worth it. You have to do the work. There are no short cuts (there is no lipo for alcoholics, and we all know lipo is only for minor touch ups, you can’t suck out hundreds of pounds of fat because it would kill you and leave you looking/feeling all wrong). Once you do the work, and find that ‘moment of clarity’ you will realize you are stronger, better and more powerful than you ever imagined. You can do anything, and the world is yours for the taking. You will find success in your work, in your social life, love and with your family.
No one can ever be truly happy if depend on drugs or alcohol to be ‘happy’. Drugs only mask problems, they never solve them. Eventually they will make anyone unhappy, unfulfilled or totally unconnected to their life and friends. So disconnected that their life will fall apart, emotionally, spiritually, mentally, physically or all of the above.
Being addicted to drugs/alcohol is equitable to being addicted to food. If you are addicted to food and constantly binge on it you become over weight. Drug/Alcohol addiction doesn’t necessarily make you overweight (certainly unhealthy though) but hypothetically it’s the same. The ‘weight’ of the problems with a drug addiction is the same except that the weight is emotional/spiritual/mental/physical. The only way to lose this ‘weight’ is to do the work. You need to work off that ‘weight’ by exercising your spirit and emotions (they become atrophied during addiction). The emotional exercise means to talk it out, search your self, or rather develop your ‘inner strength’. You will need to improve your diet which now is defined as: ALL THINGS YOU CONSUME (not just food). Only consume that which makes you stronger and more present.
Once you are ‘inner strong’ and emotionally fit the work gets easier. Once you are fit, if you slip up it’s easy to get right back on track. But most likely when you are really fit you don’t really slip up. Once you are in great shape (some people may have damaged themselves so bad they will never be truly ‘inner strong’) the addiction begins to not exist. If you address and fix your addiction early, you can control it and mitigate the damage it causes. If you do that, you may eventually be able to treat yourself to a little ‘slice of cake’ everyone and then without falling right back into addiction. But if you are still way over weight you can’t indulge until you are grounded and able to physically/emotionally metabolize your indulgence. Most people find that they don’t even like cake anymore because they like the way they look and feel without it so much better.
If you have an addiction, you can and should beat it. You can do it. If you have friends with addiction, help them. Tell them you care about them, and you want them to succeed. Once you beat your addiction, you will be in control of your life. You will find that people treat you with admiration and respect. Hold on to the good. When you feel the urge to drink, or do drugs remember the pain it causes. See the path that the drugs take you down… they take you to a place of loneliness, suffering and floundering. The path of sobriety, of balance and restraint, one choice at a time, one day at a time, takes you to deep inner strength, fulfillment, beauty and happiness.
Posted by
Postmodernism
at
9:47 AM
0
comments
NETWORK
I watched the movie ‘Network” (1976, Faye Dunaway) recently; if you haven’t seen it rent it. It’s a great film. It’s about a TV news anchor who has a breakdown and says he is going to kill himself on his show. When a network executive realizes how high his ratings are, they put him back on TV. It’s witty, satirical and very relevant today. From it’s take on the dark times (the recession of the 1970’s, the War in Vietnam) to the corporate take over of the world (just beginning then) it is a great parallel to the times we are in today. The main character ‘Howard’ is exploited by the Network until he says something on the air that hurts the networks parent company. When the CEO of the company requests to see Howard, he explains to Howard how the world and the Network really works: Corporate power and Money. Howard then takes a very dark world view and his high rating begin to decline. The Network then has to figure out how to get rid of him…
The film was way ahead of it’s time. It takes a postmodern look at not only TV, but characters, screenplay/story structure and the way the world works. It’s a neo-noir film that is comedic in its darkness and witt. After I watched it, I realized, it’s a great look at how America works. It’s interesting, scary, and available for your viewing pleasure.
Posted by
Postmodernism
at
9:45 AM
0
comments
Ramblings about TV...
Rambling about TV
Did you know that no one really knows what the entity of ‘TV’ really is. What it means and what it does…
If you ask me: TV is a postmodern religion.
People live by it. Worship it. Follow it. Do what it says. And in the worst cases it rules the entire mind of people. TV is culture. TV watches us as we watch it. How we affect TV and it effects us is not clear (Chicken or Egg?). Today we can interact with TV live. We can vote, Tweet, or email the show. Now TV is merging with the internet, it’s available on our phones and is merging with reality…
Reality TV isn’t real. But it’s also not unreal; “It’s real-like”. Reality TV brings out the worst in us if you ask me. It’s the cheapening of the medium. It cuts us down to the very worst parts and edits together stories that don’t exist. If the people on it aren’t competing for “love” (please), or groveling in the mud (ew), then they selling themselves or their “skin care lines or fashion line” that they (in ‘real’ reality) had no hand in making or creating. But what I can’t stand most is when they are not acting like themselves… they are acting like they think they should, or the other Reality stars who came before them… it’s so fake. Reality TV needs a reality check!
With that said I do like a few Reality shows. “The Amazing Race” is one of my favorites. I also like “Flipping Out” because I feel like ‘Jeff’ (the star) is the same when the camera is on or off: crazy. I also got sucked into “The Real Housewives”. The only season I couldn’t get into was Atlanta. It was too “Jerry Springer”. Bravo is on a roll if you ask me, which is great for NBC (which owns it) because NBC can’t get it’s act together.
NBC lost me when it decided to put Leno on at 10pm five nights a week. If I was Conan O’brien I’d be pissed. But more importantly it’s cheap on their part. How about you develop some real shows NBC!! Stop being so cheap! Make some new shows!! Plus Leno had his run and needs to just be done. Some people don’t know when to let go…
NBC did one thing right and that is hire Joel McHale. The Soup with Joel McHale is easily my favorite show right now, since it brings together the best (i.e. the worst) that TV has to offer. They watch all the shows I never would and give me the best parts. Love it.
Sometimes I feel like there is too much TV. Sometimes I feel like there is nothing to watch. I don’t feel like TV is getting better, per say. But I do feel like it is getting more creative and more informative. TV is finally getting diving into things it never touched before… secrets about the world. They can do this, because they know it’s hard to catch them unless you know what you are looking for. TV knows most of us, as Jean Baudrillard put it:
“You are hypnotized by the tube, by the obscene flow of images. You raised your eyelids. A vampire is kneeling over you – voluptuously – the muscles of her neck, the ivory curve of her shoulders, illuminated as if by cool moonlight. She licks her scarlet lips like an animal, glazing them with a sheen of moisture, her engorged tongue glistening as it laps the white teeth. She leans closer, you feel her cool breath, then the sharpness of incisors penetrating your neck. You close your eyes in a long ecstasy and wait – wait with beating heart.”
TV… Humanity’s Frenemy.
Posted by
Postmodernism
at
9:42 AM
0
comments
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Blockbuster
I'm almost done with my latest script!
It's been a labor of love, passion, mystery... for almost a year now. Good things take time, and I wanted to do this script right. No one has read it yet, which is weird because I always let my friends or family read parts, and tell me what they think. For this top secret mind blowing script I am not letting any one read it until its perfect.
I have high hopes for it.
I have wanted to write a mind blowing 'tent-pole' script for a while and have been developing the idea for this script in my head for three years.
I just hope the world is ready for it.
Posted by
Postmodernism
at
4:35 PM
0
comments
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Simple Fix for America's Healthcare
If the first (couple) trillion dollars spent on healthcare doesn’t make people healthier, what makes anyone believe trillions more will? Money will not make people healthier, in fact it can make people less healthy as we have seen.How can we fix healthcare without touching the existing private healthcare sector?
It’s actually quite simple!
Healthcare is like education. If you don’t do your ‘homework’ you will never learn, and you will hold everyone back. Homework is health education, food choices, and exercise.
>> FOOD IS THE BEST MEDICINE <<
Exercise is second. The point is, what is the point of paying trillions to treat people, who are not treating themselves? If someone refuses to quit smoking, why should the state spend thousands on treatment of their lung cancer? It’s pointless. It won’t help, and won’t make them better. Why should the state pay for expensive diabetes treatments that can be cured by eating better i.e. FREE?
TAX TOXIC FOOD, and food ingredients that are health detriments; Transfats, carcinogens, sugar, ect, and put the money from these taxes into the public healthcare system fund. We tax cigarettes and alcohol to pay for education and treatments, why should food be different?DO NOT tax business, health benefits, or anything else. We all know that food/diet is what determines 90% of your health. If you eat tons of sugar, and junk food, you are way more likely to have high body PH and get sick; thus you should be paying more for healthcare, and you would in the form of taxes.
This would also help show the true cost of our diet habits. People that are healthy should not be forced to pay more for people who are not healthy, or at least are not trying to be health.
Why would we tax healthcare benefits to help people get benefits? It doesn't make sense, that will make people lose benefits! We have millions of people (many illegal immigrants) not paying into the healthcare system at all. The only way to get them to pay into it, as they should, is through a Health Tax (or tax on food that detriment health). Also, public healthcare treatments must include classes on being healthy, eating right, and exercise. People with similar ailments will meet and discuss what works and what doesn’t, and how to get better, as well as track progress (AA meets Jenny Craig). If people do not attend the diet + exercise classes then they are dropped from the (expensive) treatment program and will be only be provided pills. This will weed out those that don’t really want to get better from those that do. The money will be spent on those that do.
Bottom Line:
1) We cannot afford to help people who will not help themselves.
2) Tax toxic foods, and food additives. This will pay for reform, and will lessen use giving a double benefit effect.
***
More often than not, the simplest answer is the right one!
Taxing things that are unhealthy makes perfect sense!
Sugar, transfats, carcinogens and additives are NOT a necessity for anyone. Therefore a tax on them DOES NOT HURT ANYONE. In fact it helps them make better choices. It will help them. Trust me the corn syrup lobby does not have your health in mind.
>> Taxing things that have no health value would also target everyone equally. No one has to eat junk food. <<
If people are living on junk food they are a major health risk, and this will cost them and the tax payers in the long run. Perhaps they should be persuaded to make better choices, to see the true cost.
America spends over $4,500,000,000,000.00 (trillions) a year on healthcare, like $100,000 PER PERSON and yet we are far from the healthiest people in the world? It's not lack of funding, and more funding will not fix it.
Why?
Diet. Toxic food.
Groups that are against a tax on toxic food are diabetically blind to the nature of the problem. They want the rich, or the insured, or the healthy to subsidize there lifestyle. THERE IS A HIGH COST TO EATING POORLY!
No one is saying you can't eat what you want. This is America!
But the true cost of these choices must be seen. It is the only way.
I really wonder if America has the guts (ironically is a nation of big ones) to truly reform Healthcare. As I see it, throwing more money at the problem will make things worse!!!
Ignoring the real problem, and thinking trillions more will solve anything is INSANE!!!
***
From what I heard NYC successfully banned transfats? Right? No need to tax that... Nation wide would be great, but a tax on it (at the portion, per twinky value added) is the next best thing.
jforgizmo wrote:
Since manufacturers of foodlike products are very effective lobbyists, taxing each different kind of food appropriately for it's level of junkiness will be hard to design or implement
I don't see it as that hard. 10¢ per candybar, 5¢ per can of soda, 20¢ for McDiabeties explotion, ect. Value add it. At the manufacture level, build it in to the price.
Not wanting to do what's right because there will be a fight is not what makes/made America great. The food companies will fight, but this is about what's right, and what's best for people, not their bottom lines. If congress is not able to do what's right for the people who elected them, make the hard choices, then government has truly failed us on this issue.
jforgizmo wrote:
It is much more expensive to eat fruits and vegetables than to eat burgers.
Last I checked fruit and veggies ARE cheaper than burgers, thats a cop out. Remember the true cost of burgers is very high, not only on health but on the forests cut down to raise the cattle and the methane...
jforgizmo wrote:
When most people want jobs, it is also hard to have someone availalable to work for nothing, daily, to prepare meals from scratch from fresh ingredients. Processed foods made with whole grains and unrefined oils have shorter shelf life, are less profitable, and more expensive. Packaged sweetened food products (most of what is sold) can not include stevia (only sugar, corn syrup, and a few others), because Con Agra pulled a fast one with the FDA and got only their version of stevia approved as a sweetener, so they will have a monopoly on a patented version of a natural, calorie-free sweetener.
You can process food without transfats, carcinogens, artificial sweetner, and MSG. There are health alternatives that still allow for a long shelf life. And we don't need need to ban all those things, there is a place for them, I am just saying that the true cost of them should be shown. "The high cost of Low Price". America needs to spend more on prevention to prevent bankruptcy on intervention.
All sweeteners (real or artificial) have no health value and should be taxed. If its not diabetes, it's cancer, same damage, no benefits come from them. Tax them all the same.
In regards to the rest of what you said:
I think Universal Healthcare is ideal, but in America where 50% of healthcare dollars spent goes to 5% of the population, this gets tricky.
I think what we need is a Public and Private parallel system, like we have for schools and universities. We need to have universal care, but we need to keep the private side intact (innovation et al). If you can pay, and have millions you should be able to spend it on your health, this is America. But on the same token, if you have no money, or are just getting by, you should get the care or the treatment you need without being bankrupted by a system designed to make money, not treat people.
So, we need a public system designed to keep people healthy (tax junk food, health classes, food/exercise as part of treatment) as well as a private system that keeps the ideas and innovations flowing. If you can pay you can get crazy death delaying treatments and not have to take health classes.
The Fix of Healthcare requires a three prong fix.
1) Encourage health through incentives: Tax junk food, Tax rebates for staying healthy
2) Create a public universal system that covers emergencies and the basics. Rationing exists already! What do you think your health insurance company does to you? We need clinics and to get people out of the emergency room, who should not be there.
3) Turn Health Insurance to be more like car insurance. You buy it and file a claim for 'other' treatments should you need or want them, or put money into a health saving account to pay for treatments that are not part of the public system. Getting the basics and emergency treatments off the backs of private insurance will solve a great deal of the problem and will stop the frivolous testing and fraud.
***
Bottom line:
America needs healthcare reform >> Create a universal public system
America needs to be healthier >> incentivize better diet, encourage health
We will be so much more productive and prosperous once we get this done.
Posted by
Postmodernism
at
11:29 PM
0
comments
Friday, June 5, 2009
Movie Review: Terminator
Loud. Action. Intense. Confusing. VFX-overload.
I was not as blown away as everything in the film was, but it is a great film for video game types who love to see things blow up, and love to shoot at everything.
I have only seen one Terminator movie (a very long time ago) and I think the presented a problem for me in understanding what was going on in this film. The story didn’t really come together or make a whole lot of sense to me.
While over 50% of the film is like an exploration in blending outdoor explosions with digital special effects, the human acting parts seem pushed to back. To me it seems as if the director McG did not focus enough on these parts, maybe a little to much emphasis on explosions, noise and digital. I know a lot of people are really into that, but for me it only works if you can blend it with your actors well. For me, I’m not sure that came across on screen. Christian Bale was way over done in every scene, most of the other people were fine for me.
The movie was not bad, but it wasn’t great either.
Posted by
Postmodernism
at
12:54 AM
0
comments
Movie Review: Star Trek
Another old franchise successfully revived. Good job JJ Abrams and Paramount.
I was never a huge Star Trek fan, I never got into the old stuff, but this film I truly enjoyed. Great casting, fun, mind bending effects, good story… it had all I could really ask for in blockbuster Hollywood film.
I thought it was very clever how they get out of the old franchise parameters by using a change in the “space-time-continuum” to change the whole future of the people so the shows and movies you saw before… they are now a parallel world that technically will never happen. This is perfect so the writers of the future films have total creative freedom. I can just see the pitch to the studio executives; it’s a win-win!
I love these type of films, fast, technical, set in the future… so much fun. They bring out the nerd in me.
Posted by
Postmodernism
at
12:54 AM
0
comments
Movie Review: Angeles & Demons
Review: Angeles & Demons
Beautiful. Graphic. Moving [Fast]. Intriguing. Catholic.
I really enjoyed it. I never read the book so I went into it fresh. Usually when you read the book you are disappointed because it wasn’t as good, but this didn’t play into it for me. I love these kind of stories, I think this exactly the kind of fare that people are interested in these days –esoteric, science, religion, secrets.
A classic Hollywood film, it had great production value, beautiful scenery and stunning visual/special effects. I thoroughly enjoyed the visual spectacle and was surprised (sort of) to learn they did not film at all in Vatican city (why would the Vatican allow it though, right?); the point is, you can hardly tell.
This film is much more sympathetic and kind to Catholicism than “Da Vinci Code”. The inner workings of the church are fascinating to me. The history of the church is also so connected to the history of Western Civilization and the world at large that it makes for great subject matter. The clash of religion and science seemed oddly forced, in the film though it is the central theme of the movie. Chunks of dialogue eluding to it come off as blatant exposition and didn’t really feel real. The whole ‘Illuminati’ thing also didn’t really fit together for me…
Some say the “Illuminati” actually control the church today, but good luck proving that, and you didn’t hear it from me!
Ewan McGregor did good. Tom Hanks was Tom Hanks. And everyone else was pretty good for me.
All in all I liked it.
Posted by
Postmodernism
at
12:53 AM
0
comments